2004 Fiat Palio vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Fiat Palio is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Nissan Cedric (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Palio. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Palio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 421 kg more than 2004 Fiat Palio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Nissan Cedric (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Fiat Palio. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1968 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Fiat Palio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Fiat Palio | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Palio | Cedric |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 905 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2700 mm |