2004 Fiat Panda vs. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2004 Fiat Panda is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Fiat Panda | 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Fiat | Studebaker |
Model | Panda | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Body Type | Crossover | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1248 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2980 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 68 L |