2004 Fiat Panda vs. 1962 Volvo 120
To start off, 2004 Fiat Panda is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Fiat Panda (70 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 120.
Because 2004 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Volvo 120. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Fiat Panda (145 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 120. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2004 Fiat Panda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Fiat Panda | 1962 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | Panda | 120 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1251 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1510 mm |