2004 Fiat Panda vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2004 Fiat Panda is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,556 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Panda. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Panda.
Because 2004 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Fiat Panda | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Fiat | Lotus |
Model | Panda | Elan |
Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
Body Type | Crossover | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1248 cc | 1556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 29 L |