2004 Fiat Panda vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2004 Fiat Panda is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,247 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Fiat Panda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Fiat Panda (71 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Fiat Panda weights approximately 113 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Fiat Panda | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Panda | 9 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1247 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 69.6 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 160 km/hour | 138 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.3 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 38 L |