2004 Fiat Panda vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2004 Fiat Panda is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Fiat Panda (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Fiat Panda weights approximately 330 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Fiat Panda (98 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Fiat Panda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Fiat Panda | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Fiat | Zastava |
| Model | Panda | 102 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 98 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2160 mm |
