2004 Fiat Panda vs. 1992 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Fiat Panda is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,251 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Fiat Panda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Fiat Panda (70 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1992 Renault Clio. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Clio.
Because 2004 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Fiat Panda (145 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Clio. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Fiat Panda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Fiat Panda | 1992 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Fiat | Renault |
| Model | Panda | Clio |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 1251 cc | 1107 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 48 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 69.6 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1400 mm |
