2004 Fiat Panda vs. 1996 Renault Clio

To start off, 2004 Fiat Panda is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 191 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Panda. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 550 kg more than 2004 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Fiat Panda. (98 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Fiat Panda.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Fiat Panda 1996 Renault Clio
Make Fiat Renault
Model Panda Clio
Year Released 2004 1996
Body Type Crossover Hatchback
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 1242 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 59 HP 250 HP
Torque 98 Nm 407 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1100 kg 1650 kg
Vehicle Length 3540 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1600 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1630 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2230 mm 2490 mm