2004 Fiat Stilo vs. 1962 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2004 Fiat Stilo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,368 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Fiat Stilo (94 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elite. (83 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 575 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Fiat Stilo (129 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elite. (102 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2004 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elite.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Fiat Stilo | 1962 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Fiat | Lotus |
Model | Stilo | Elite |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 1215 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 83 HP |
Torque | 129 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72.1 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 66.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1190 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 29 L |