2004 Fiat Stilo vs. 1965 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Fiat Stilo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Fiat Stilo (94 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 255 kg more than 1965 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Fiat Stilo (128 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Fiat Stilo | 1965 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Stilo | Cedric |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 128 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2540 mm |