2004 Fiat Stilo vs. 1966 MG MGC
To start off, 2004 Fiat Stilo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Stilo. (131 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Stilo.
Because 1966 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 MG MGC (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Fiat Stilo. (162 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1966 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Fiat Stilo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Fiat Stilo | 1966 MG MGC | |
Make | Fiat | MG |
Model | Stilo | MGC |
Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1745 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2560 mm |