2004 Fiat Stilo vs. 1969 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2004 Fiat Stilo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Fiat Stilo (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 34 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Fiat Stilo | 1969 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Stilo | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1344 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 40 L |