2004 Fiat Stilo vs. 1972 Mazda 616
To start off, 2004 Fiat Stilo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 79 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 415 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Fiat Stilo (196 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Fiat Stilo | 1972 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Stilo | 616 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 196 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2480 mm |