2004 Fiat Stilo vs. 1979 Mazda 616
To start off, 2004 Fiat Stilo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Mazda 616 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mazda 616 (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Stilo. (71 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mazda 616 should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 188 kg more than 1979 Mazda 616.
Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mazda 616 (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Fiat Stilo. (113 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1979 Mazda 616 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Fiat Stilo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Fiat Stilo | 1979 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Stilo | 616 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 113 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1098 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2480 mm |