2004 Fiat Stilo vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 2004 Fiat Stilo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Fiat Stilo (94 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 70 kg more than 2004 Fiat Stilo.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Fiat Stilo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Fiat Stilo (134 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Fiat Stilo | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | Fiat | Jeep |
Model | Stilo | CJ7 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2380 mm |