2004 Fiat Stilo vs. 1986 Nissan Pulsar

To start off, 2004 Fiat Stilo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,745 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Fiat Stilo (134 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 580 kg more than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Fiat Stilo (162 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. (97 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Pulsar.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Fiat Stilo 1986 Nissan Pulsar
Make Fiat Nissan
Model Stilo Pulsar
Year Released 2004 1986
Body Type Station Wagon Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1745 cc 1270 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 134 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 162 Nm 97 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3600 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1460 kg 880 kg
Vehicle Length 4520 mm 4140 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2420 mm