2004 Fiat Stilo vs. 1989 Lotus Carlton
To start off, 2004 Fiat Stilo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Lotus Carlton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Lotus Carlton would be higher. At 3,615 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Lotus Carlton is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Lotus Carlton is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Lotus Carlton. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Lotus Carlton (569 Nm) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Fiat Stilo. (128 Nm). This means 1989 Lotus Carlton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Fiat Stilo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Fiat Stilo | 1989 Lotus Carlton | |
| Make | Fiat | Lotus |
| Model | Stilo | Carlton |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1368 cc | 3615 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Top Speed | 171 km/hour | 289 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2750 mm |
