2004 Fiat Stilo vs. 2002 Spyker C8
To start off, 2004 Fiat Stilo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 3,998 cc, 2002 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 45 kg more than 2002 Spyker C8.
Because 2002 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Fiat Stilo | 2002 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Fiat | Spyker |
| Model | Stilo | C8 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2445 cc | 3998 cc |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 213 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 100 L |
