2004 Fiat Ulysse vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Fiat Ulysse is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Fiat Ulysse weights approximately 254 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Ulysse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2004 Fiat Ulysse has manual transmission. 2004 Fiat Ulysse will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Fiat Ulysse | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Fiat | Oldsmobile |
Model | Ulysse | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1736 kg | 1482 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2760 mm |