2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 1953 Maserati A6GCM
To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCM would be higher. At 1,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Maserati A6GCM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Maserati A6GCM (194 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2004 Ford C-MAX. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Maserati A6GCM should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 804 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCM.
Because 1953 Maserati A6GCM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Maserati A6GCM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford C-MAX | 1953 Maserati A6GCM | |
Make | Ford | Maserati |
Model | C-MAX | A6GCM |
Year Released | 2004 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 570 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2290 mm |