2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 1958 Simca Plein Ceil
To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Simca Plein Ceil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Simca Plein Ceil would be higher. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford C-MAX (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1958 Simca Plein Ceil. (56 HP @ 200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1958 Simca Plein Ceil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 322 kg more than 1958 Simca Plein Ceil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Simca Plein Ceil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Simca Plein Ceil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford C-MAX | 1958 Simca Plein Ceil | |
Make | Ford | Simca |
Model | C-MAX | Plein Ceil |
Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2360 mm |