2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford C-MAX (104 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford C-MAX (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford C-MAX | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | C-MAX | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2540 mm |
