2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 1963 MG 1100

To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford C-MAX (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1963 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1963 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 597 kg more than 1963 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford C-MAX (197 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 MG 1100.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford C-MAX 1963 MG 1100
Make Ford MG
Model C-MAX 1100
Year Released 2004 1963
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1098 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 153 HP 53 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 197 Nm 83 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1422 kg 825 kg
Vehicle Length 4340 mm 3730 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1540 mm
Vehicle Height 1600 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2380 mm