2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford C-MAX (104 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 870 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford C-MAX (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2004 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford C-MAX | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | C-MAX | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 1560 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2060 mm |
