2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 1972 TVR M
To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 TVR M would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 522 kg more than 1972 TVR M.
Because 1972 TVR M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 TVR M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford C-MAX | 1972 TVR M | |
Make | Ford | TVR |
Model | C-MAX | M |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2290 mm |