2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 1975 Mazda 929
To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford C-MAX (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1975 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 262 kg more than 1975 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford C-MAX (197 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda 929. (137 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford C-MAX | 1975 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | C-MAX | 929 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 65 L |