2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 1976 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford C-MAX (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1976 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford C-MAX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford C-MAX (160 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm). This means 2004 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford C-MAX | 1976 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | C-MAX | LJ 20 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 37 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |