2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 1982 Subaru DL
To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Subaru DL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Subaru DL would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford C-MAX (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1982 Subaru DL. (67 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1982 Subaru DL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 554 kg more than 1982 Subaru DL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford C-MAX (160 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Subaru DL. (100 Nm). This means 2004 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Subaru DL.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford C-MAX | 1982 Subaru DL | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | C-MAX | DL |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 100 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2470 mm |