2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 3,955 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser (154 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2004 Ford C-MAX. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 478 kg more than 2004 Ford C-MAX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser (300 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford C-MAX. (197 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford C-MAX | 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | C-MAX | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3955 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2740 mm |