2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 1983 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1983 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford C-MAX (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 242 kg more than 1983 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford C-MAX. (197 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1983 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford C-MAX | 1983 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | C-MAX | Celica |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2640 mm |
