2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2004 Ford C-MAX. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 189 kg more than 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass (217 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford C-MAX. (160 Nm). This means 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford C-MAX.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford C-MAX 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Make Ford Oldsmobile
Model C-MAX Cutlass
Year Released 2004 1987
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1596 cc 2260 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 114 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 160 Nm 217 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1374 kg 1185 kg
Vehicle Length 4340 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1600 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2640 mm