2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 1988 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Suzuki Alto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Suzuki Alto would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford C-MAX (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1988 Suzuki Alto. (38 HP @ 7500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1988 Suzuki Alto.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford C-MAX (197 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Suzuki Alto. (59 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Suzuki Alto.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford C-MAX | 1988 Suzuki Alto | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | C-MAX | Alto |
Year Released | 2004 | 1988 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 547 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 59 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 55 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 30 L |