2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 1995 Nissan 100 NX
To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan 100 NX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan 100 NX would be higher. Both 2004 Ford C-MAX and 1995 Nissan 100 NX are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford C-MAX (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1995 Nissan 100 NX. (141 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1995 Nissan 100 NX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 287 kg more than 1995 Nissan 100 NX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford C-MAX (197 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Nissan 100 NX. (182 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2004 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Nissan 100 NX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford C-MAX | 1995 Nissan 100 NX | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | C-MAX | 100 NX |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1320 mm |