2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 1995 Volvo 850
To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 1,982 cc (5 cylinders), 1995 Volvo 850 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Volvo 850 (124 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2004 Ford C-MAX. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Volvo 850 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Volvo 850 weights approximately 16 kg more than 2004 Ford C-MAX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Volvo 850 (170 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford C-MAX. (160 Nm). This means 1995 Volvo 850 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford C-MAX | 1995 Volvo 850 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | C-MAX | 850 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 170 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2670 mm |