2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 712 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford C-MAX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford C-MAX | 2002 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | C-MAX | Minica |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2350 mm |
