2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 2008 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2008 Mazda Tribute is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford C-MAX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford C-MAX would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2004 Ford C-MAX. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford C-MAX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda Tribute (201 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford C-MAX. (160 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford C-MAX | 2008 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | C-MAX | Tribute |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 201 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2070 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2630 mm |
