2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 2009 Mazda 6

To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford C-MAX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford C-MAX would be higher. At 2,488 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2004 Ford C-MAX. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 249 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (228 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford C-MAX. (160 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford C-MAX. 2009 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford C-MAX has manual transmission. 2004 Ford C-MAX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford C-MAX 2009 Mazda 6
Make Ford Mazda
Model C-MAX 6
Year Released 2004 2009
Body Type Minivan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1596 cc 2488 cc
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 114 HP 169 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 160 Nm 228 Nm
Engine Bore Size 79 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81.4 mm 100 mm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1374 kg 1125 kg
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2730 mm