2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford C-MAX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford C-MAX would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 204 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford C-MAX | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | C-MAX | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3678 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1585 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2550 mm |
