2004 Ford C-MAX vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford C-MAX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford C-MAX would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford C-MAX (153 HP) has 74 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford C-MAX (197 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2004 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford C-MAX | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | C-MAX | Micra |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 46 L |
