2004 Ford Crown Victoria vs. 1962 Renault 4
To start off, 2004 Ford Crown Victoria is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 4 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Crown Victoria is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Crown Victoria weights approximately 1294 kg more than 1962 Renault 4.
Because 2004 Ford Crown Victoria is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Crown Victoria. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Crown Victoria | 1962 Renault 4 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Crown Victoria | 4 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 603 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 546 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 34 L |