2004 Ford E-150 vs. 1962 MG MGA
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 MG MGA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 MG MGA would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1962 MG MGA. (71 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1962 MG MGA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1227 kg more than 1962 MG MGA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 MG MGA. (104 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 MG MGA.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-150 | 1962 MG MGA | |
Make | Ford | MG |
Model | E-150 | MGA |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 104 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2127 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |