2004 Ford E-150 vs. 1969 Reliant Rebel
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Reliant Rebel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Reliant Rebel would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1969 Reliant Rebel. (31 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1969 Reliant Rebel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1552 kg more than 1969 Reliant Rebel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 336 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Reliant Rebel. (52 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Reliant Rebel.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-150 | 1969 Reliant Rebel | |
Make | Ford | Reliant |
Model | E-150 | Rebel |
Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 31 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 52 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2127 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2270 mm |