2004 Ford E-150 vs. 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho. (78 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 995 kg more than 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho. (118 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-150 | 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho | |
Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
Model | E-150 | Rancho |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 118 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2127 kg | 1132 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |