2004 Ford E-150 vs. 1982 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. (94 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 997 kg more than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. (152 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-150 | 1982 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | E-150 | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1952 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2127 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2530 mm |
