2004 Ford E-150 vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1097 kg more than 1996 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (127 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-150 | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | E-150 | 200 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 127 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2127 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2510 mm |