2004 Ford E-150 vs. 1998 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jaguar XJR (370 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1998 Jaguar XJR.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-150. (388 Nm). This means 1998 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-150 | 1998 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | E-150 | XJR |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 370 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 525 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2127 kg | 1837 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 87 L |
