2004 Ford E-150 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1101 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer. (137 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-150 | 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | E-150 | Lancer |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 137 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2127 kg | 1026 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1400 mm |