2004 Ford E-150 vs. 2006 Honda Ridgeline
To start off, 2006 Honda Ridgeline is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda Ridgeline (247 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda Ridgeline should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1274 kg more than 2006 Honda Ridgeline.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Honda Ridgeline. (332 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Honda Ridgeline.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-150 | 2006 Honda Ridgeline | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | E-150 | Ridgeline |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3472 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 332 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2127 kg | 853 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3110 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 83 L |