2004 Ford E-150 vs. 2007 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2007 Nissan Micra is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 2007 Nissan Micra. (87 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan Micra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1137 kg more than 2007 Nissan Micra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Nissan Micra. (128 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-150 | 2007 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | E-150 | Micra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 128 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2127 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 46 L |