2004 Ford E-150 vs. 2008 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2008 Toyota Tundra is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Tundra (271 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 741 kg more than 2008 Toyota Tundra.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Tundra (425 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-150. (388 Nm). This means 2008 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-150 | 2008 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | E-150 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Van | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 425 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2127 kg | 1386 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3710 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 100 L |
